casino      blackjack      roulette      poker   

  Bingo Online - free online bingo guide

Cryptologic UK style 'Fruit' slots, beware

- As this is an international forum, I'll give a quick intro. In the UK, the Vegas style slot, where you press a button and are paid out purely on the combination, is a rarity, confined to casinos and gambling arcades. The more popular style of gambling machine is the UK style fruit machine. This is less dependent on winning combinations of fruit, than on winning on sub-games, that involve collecting items on board-game style tracks, or making numbers on the reels add up to certain numbers. It seems to be a win-win, the players enjoy exploring the sub-games and the operators experience greater play of people finding out these features. All well and good?? Not exactly. Because of the 'fun' nature of the games, the game designers have, legally, been able to cheat their players by offering gambles that they have no chance of winning. Examples of this include making the players move on the 'game over' space on the feature, or, more evil, offering the player a hi-lo gamble. The resulting number always busts them. This has been proved by people ripping game ROMs, pausing the game at one of these gambles, and playing both hi and lo, always losing. For background on this phenomenon, see here . Recently there has been a change in the voluntary code of conduct, machines now have the legend 'This machine may, on occasions, offer the player a gamble that they have no chance of winning'. Not ideal, but a start. Onto the online bit. I've had a test run at Intercasino and UKBetting on low stakes, on their games Fruit Fight and Super Sideshow, to see if the hi/lo gambles (where you predict if the next number is higher or lower without the same number reappearing) were random. It's a small sample, but some trends appear... Number: 2 or 11 (1 in 11 chance of failure) 7 gambles, 2 failures Number: 3 or 10 (2 in 11 chance of failure) 15 gambles, 8 failures Number: 4 or 9 (3 in 11 chance of failure) 12 gambles, 7 failures This is a small sample, but the trend seems to be a >50% chance of failure where the true odds are massively in your favour. Some other posts here reveals that other players are of this opinion. This suggests to me that the results are 'rigged' in some way. This is a very worrying development to me, I've only played the conventional slots in the belief that there is a RNG deciding if I win, and that if they have a 'gamble feature' (e.g. red/black cards) this is a true 50/50 gamble. Another feature which I noticed towards the end of the test session, was something I've noticed on real-life fruities. On those, there is a tendency if, after losing a multitude of gambles, for the machine to be 'happy' and to start paying out higher amounts, presumably to keep the payout above the machine's minimum. On my test run, the potential payout over time resembled a rising stockmarket graph. Initially after given 1,2 coin wins, which I gambled for my research and lost, the machine then started to give me greater prizes, which again, I hi/lo gambled and then lost at what was felt to be a predetermined level. I appreciate this is a more contentious point, and would need for the experiment to be repeated several times, but I am disgusted at the possibility that an online casino icould possibly corrupt a winning chance depending on past results. To use a comparison, we might like the idea of the roulette popping a few winning numbers if we're down on our luck, but I'm sure we wouldn't like it if it did the converse when we're on a roll.... In conclusion, if there's from Cryptologic/Wagerlogic about, could they answer these questions: 1) Is the hi/lo gambles on your 'Fruit Machines' a true, random gamble according to the implied odds? 2) If the answer to the above question is 'No', is it right and proper that you should feature this non-random game amongst other games (e.g. Blackjack) which is RNG dealt and is dependent to a certain extent to players' gambles to success or failure? And do you think that it is misleading to customers to not list any disclaimers on the 3) If a player has lost previous games, does this have an effect on the prize size of previous games. And do you think it's fair that a casino should pay its games out only after considering the player's previous losses. I'm asking this question as I believe that this non-random behaviour is a spur to create problem gamblers attempting to beat the unbeatable.

- Crypto introduced these slots, calling them 'UK pub style slots'. And that is exactly what you have. Anyone who has played UK fruit machines a lot (like me ) knows darned well there is absolutely nothing random about the Hi/Lo, chances of getting a win, or a feature. The only random thing, is if you happen to be playing the machine when it decides it is going to pay out! So I don't understand what you are complaining about. They are exactly what Crypto say they are: Rigged pieces of shite. It's sort of ironic that you posted when you did, because last night, under the influence of alcohol, I had a little bash on one at 25c a go, just to remind myself how awful they are. Got about 20 features in 100 spins - all of which busted out at less than $3.00, of course. But then I fell off my chair when a $100 win dropped straight in! Screenshot to follow... (this evening) I still think they're crap though. But I would like to hear from anyone who has ever won ANYTHING on the 'Super Heavy Weight Feature' - every time I got it, it went on 'lose' on the first move.

- Quote: Originally Posted by martinrossbrown Number: 2 or 11 (1 in 11 chance of failure) 7 gambles, 2 failures Number: 3 or 10 (2 in 11 chance of failure) 15 gambles, 8 failures Number: 4 or 9 (3 in 11 chance of failure) 12 gambles, 7 failures Perhaps you could calculate the probability of this? p = 2/11, n =15, q = 9/11, so standard deviation = sqrt((18*15)/121) Giving that for the 3 and 10s alone, the chance of the sample coming from a fair game is 4808-1. In other words, with 99.98% certainty, the game is not fair. If you took the other numbers as well, the chance that the game is fair grows even smaller. It seems a fair assumption that the game is rigged, but then what do you expect from slots? I would be more interested to test the fairness of the doubling up features of various video poker games (not that I play them), since these at least claim to be fair.

- THe "Hi-Lo" in actual uk Pubs is worse than your experiances posted above. Nothing much is random with Pub machines im afraid.

- I've known this for years and I think most people who have played the fruit machines know. It is only a true skill feature when the word 'skill' is in the feature. At other times it is predetermined. The payouts are legally allowed to be as low as 72% on these machines but due to the random nature being predetermined mostly, it is possible to have an advantage with them if you play immediately after someone else because of this 'feature'. For example, normally if you put 50p in a random machine and it pays nothing, the past experience doesn't affect the future odds so that another 50p won't have different odds. But since it is often predetermined, you are slightly more likely to win the second time you put 50p in if no wins occurred the first time! Not a lot of people know that.

- Ah yes anyone from the "pub scene" knows too well that its not so much random as randomly fixed But at the end of the day, does it matter? After all, a "published payout" will be available and thats what you are playing for. If its 75% then it doesnt matter what hi/lo gamble you have, what symbols drop, what anything in fact, 75% of what you put in you'll get back (on average). If you happen to play "best strategy" (which with the interactive features pub slots have is more applicable now), you should get more than 75% while people who dont play optimum strategy will probably get less, but nonetheless the average published payout will remain the key. The up-side to Crypto's slots and the new MG Pub slots coming soon are that the payouts are far more likely to be waaay above what pub slots pay out..probably nearer 90% at a guess so it all sounds positive to me

- Screenshot as promised.... (Hopefully Slotchik won't spot it in this thread, and take the piss out of me for only betting 25c/spin ) I would still like to hear from anyone who has ever won ANYTHING on the 'Super Heavy Weight Feature', or maybe hit the Jackpot??? .

- Quote: Originally Posted by KasinoKing It's sort of ironic that you posted when you did, because last night, under the influence of alcohol, I had a little bash on one at 25c a go, just to remind myself how awful they are. Got about 20 features in 100 spins - all of which busted out at less than $3.00, of course. But then I fell off my chair when a $100 win dropped straight in! Screenshot to follow... (this evening) Nice hit KK. Now run for your life! Mitch

- Just for the record these Fruit Machines in the UK have always (at least for the last 10 years) had to include on the machine words to the effect of 'the odds of winning any particular games are not necessarily those shown'. This clearly covers this and I'm actually amazed anyone would think that high/low bets on them were anything other than non-random. Surely everyone knows slots/fruit machines aren't randon? They're purely computers that simply payout a set percentage. It's why casino's love them so much - there's no risk of them losing money on them. MRB - the questions that you raise to the casino are pointless. Do you think it is right that a land based casino's has both random table games and slots/fruit machines? I'd be surprised if your nswer was no. And your question 3) purely asks do they think it is right that they have slots in the casino at all. Afterall that is purely what slots do. I do however agree with your point regarding making it clear to players that certain features (i.e high/low bets) are not entirely random. This is a well known fact to any UK fruit machine player, however is obviously not if you are not familiar with the games. This should be made clear to players, otherwise the situation is similar to the issue at Slotland where they do not clearly show that their Jacks or Better game is non-random. As always as much transparency as possible is what's best for the player and the industry.

- Quote: Originally Posted by KasinoKing So I don't understand what you are complaining about. They are exactly what Crypto say they are: Rigged pieces of shite. That's exactly what they don't say. And IMO it's unfair to include them in with games that are played at their true odds. That's all I'm asking for, clarity. Quote: Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler 3) purely asks do they think it is right that they have slots in the casino at all. Afterall that is purely what slots do. My understanding of the non-progressive Vegas-style slots was that each event was individual - i.e it is possible for a jackpot to drop in twice in a row if the million-to-one chance happened - and on your 1st spin of the night as much as the 10000th, not 'wait for the machines to fill up then pay sometime it's ready'. This disadvantages the irregular player, and encourages people to play to 'chase' the money they have already invested.

  craps      baccarat      bingo      online casino